Time for tough decisions around 
water funding

By Peter Silcock, chief executive, Civil Contractors New Zealand 

THE NATIONAL SURGE in infrastructure investment and election promises to invest more are good news for us all.

However, most of the new investments and promises are focused on transport while our ageing three waters infrastructure is increasingly becoming the poor cousin.

The relative lack of investment in our three waters infrastructure is complex but, in my view, it is principally tied back to the differences between the funding models. The transport network by nature needs to be connected across the country and a good portion of our local roads are funded nationally.

The three waters infrastructure is not connecting nationally and is funded and managed by local authorities. It is also mostly unseen by the public. If the roading network is not maintained people experience the pot holes and congestion first hand and soon start to complain. By contrast a pipeline may be leaking, or approaching its capacity for years before anyone notices it and then gets around to fixing it.

While we don’t have a nationally connected water infrastructure network the three waters are a critical service that is vital to our national social, environmental and economic wellbeing.

I am not suggesting that central government should take over the management of our three waters infrastructure (although a combined funding model like our local roads would be worth investigating), but it certainly needs to ensure that the right tools and funding are in place to enable local government to do the job.

The government’s announcement earlier this year of the Housing Infrastructure Fund targeted at high growth councils is a step in that direction. But it only looks to remove barriers to new homes being built rather than addressing issues about the maintenance and replacement of our existing water infrastructure.

The challenges we face in the three waters space are not just about growth councils. Comprehensive, long-term nationwide solutions are required.

As we head into the election it is great to see various parties committing to investing in infrastructure, but they are ignoring the major issues of funding for local government work on our water infrastructure. We desperately need more tools and funding options because New Zealand is facing a perfect storm of issues including:

  • Ageing assets resulting in more maintenance, and increasingly, replacement work.
  • Climate change pressures requiring systems that can cope with more extreme floods, long and more intense drought events and sea level changes.
  • More resilience to enable systems to get up and running after major events like storms and earthquakes.
  • Population growth and urban infill placing more strain on existing systems.
  • Increased pressure on fresh water supplies from changing land use.

The pressure on our three waters infrastructure is intense all over the country not just in high growth areas.

In fact, we know that there are significant pressures in areas with low or negative growth as well. If we don’t find a better way to fund the maintenance and replacement work required then our ability to provide the level of service that is expected by the public will continue to decline.

The need for new funding tools should not be an excuse for inaction. Tough decisions need to be made by councils based on the community’s expectations of the level of service and strong technical advice.

Councils need to better engage the community about how we can meet their expectations and the future consequences of under investment.

They also need to make some tough decisions to increase rates and user changes if that is what is required.

Related posts

Parting words from Jeremy Sole- a final column

Contrafed PUblishing

Smoko antics

Contrafed PUblishing

John Deere K-Series wheel loaders

Contrafed PUblishing